User Avatar Image

Rate the Signature of the Person Above You!

posted by Snicklin on - last edited - Viewed by 2.3K users

The rules here are the same as the thread Rate the Avatar of the Person Above You, only instead of rating each other's avatars, you rate their signatures.

Let's do it!

651 Comments - Linear Discussion: Classic Style
  • @Chyron8472 said: 3/10

    The Enrichment Center is required to remind you that you will be baked, and then there will be cake.



    Where did you find that part from Portal? Then again it's been a while since i played Portal.

    Also 7/10

  • 8/10

    I enjoy the little chats between Sam and Max.

  • 2/10.

    You kick it off not only by claiming to be a pony, but by as the same trite Doctor Who joke that everyone and their dog has done some variation on. While I love Doctor Who as much as the next person, the fandom as a whole needs to collectively begin to make more clever references, rather than repeat the same one over and over to the point of exhaustion.

    Links to your other profiles on the internet, as you have in the second line, don't necessarily harm a signature, but still, best to avoid them or put them on your main profile if possible. (Also, who still has a Blogspot I mean really what's next Friendster) And phrased the way it is, I can tell it's supposed to be a joke, or some sort of reference, but I honestly can't tell exactly where the humor lies. Needs work.

    Self-deprecation! I like that. However, when you're talking about how boring you are, and it's absolutely true, it's not really a good thing. And what necessitated the use of a third line? Could this not have gone somewhere on the second? That would have made that line more cluttered, yes, but it would have consolidated space overall.

    In all, I have to give you an F-minus on this one. I'm sorry, but you'll need to work harder if you want to pass your next exam.

  • Your signature is very confusing to me. Not the content, but the context. Considering the lack of punctuation, the overuse of laughter and the out of place number at the end, which seems to signify a support of Marijuana, you set yourself up as what, on the surface, would appear to be a troll come from Tumblr or 4chan or some equally appalling site.

    However, your overly long analyses and posts signify that you are taking this forum quite seriously. Your signature is completely non-indicative of your character as a forumite.

    For me, a signature is less about making the people laugh, and more about showing fellow forumites who you truly are. While I admire your ability to type out a wall of text so fluently and flawlessly, your signature simply misses the point of a signature entirely.

    0/10

    (Also, your walls of text are becoming a pain to read.)

  • 0/10. You have failed to take any of my criticisms into account for your second draft, so I'm going to have to dock your remaining points. I'm going to need to see you after class to discuss if you're really ready for this course.

    (Also I set up the impression that I'm a troll from Tumblr?? Guy, the word "Tumbl" is in my signature how could I possibly not be from that site)

  • 0/10 - Stupid. 420 is lame. So is smoking pot. (yes, it's a fake troll, but it works on me.)




    @Chyron8472 said: The Enrichment Center is required to remind you that you will be baked, and then there will be cake. @Chyron8472 said: Where did you find that part from Portal?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLIhNyInxtY

  • 6/10. I like the first quote, as common sayings that are typed in an atrocious manner always bring a smile to my face for whatever bizarre reason. The second, while mildly amusing in its own right, has two problems with it. The first is that it mentions pie, which is a sign that the speaker is almost completely comedically bankrupt and down to only what they think is "WACKY" or "QUIRKY" to discuss, much the same as cheese. The second is that it makes the signature much longer than it needs to be, distracting the reader and drawing their attention downwards below the actual post itself.

  • @16_BIT_MARIO1 said: The second, while mildly amusing in its own right, has two problems with it. [...]The second is that it makes the signature much longer than it needs to be, distracting the reader and drawing their attention downwards below the actual post itself.


    Yeah, I'll agree with that. Also, it's a dated reference (coolsome was making fun of Rick Santorum.)



    Also-- 7/10. Very true. Though, you're reaching into complex vocabulary words which some (not me, though) would find confusing and wordy.

    Still, very true.

  • 5/10. Hayden's illiteracy amazes even me. He’s going to give young children a bad name.

  • 0/12 I mean seriously don't type out actions in your signature that's just dumb

Add Comment