Hard Evidence Case 4 - this makes no sense! *SPOILERS*

[azza29]

I've just played through case four, the conclusion doesn't make any sense. I mean the wife is blind right, but the evidence that proves she's guilty is a crossword puzzle?

I mean come on! How could a blind person do a crossword puzzle? It says early in the case she's completely blind, and can only tell the difference between light and dark, so there is no way she could have done that crossword puzzle.

Seriously this makes no sense, can anyone shed light on why this is a logical conclusion? Maybe someone from Telltale who worked on the game?

[David E]

If I recall correctly, the crossword (and other evidence) proves that she's not blind, and misleading the CSIs.

[MarkDarin]

It's true. If you pay attention, the CSIs will comment several times on the fact that the wife has been lying/exaggerating about her blindness. The wife did state that she could only see light & dark, but people do tend to lie about these things when faced with murder. In this case, the evidence exposes the lie.