Thread: Bone: The Film
View Single Post
Old 03/28/2009, 05:40 am   #35
iRock
No, really, I do.
 
iRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: My body, of course!
Posts: 39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Limenut View Post
So Mr Smith is thinking of doing it 2D?!? No-one here had even suggested that, but thinking about it, I suppose it's not a bad idea. I'd prefer 3D, but that may be exposure to telltale...
Wow, this just popped an idea into my head!

So, animation is best. I would love stop motion, but I highly doubt it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Molokov View Post
The stuff they're using to make Coraline, maybe?
Firstly, I loved that movie. Which is why I know that it took SEVEN YEARS to make. I doubt that WB would take seven+ years to make a movie. Henry Selick would, but only because he loves stop motion. 2D animation would rock, and CG comes last. It's what I expect WB to due, because it's cheap and fast.

But, I think the movie should be done in 3D! But none of that red-and-blue stuff. RealD 3D ONLY! Or maybe glasses-less 3D, like in Avatar...

The Great Cow Race would flourish (If they made a sequel or if it was all squished into one movie) and Ted the Bug's antennae would fly out at'cha, etc.! Not to mention how cool everyone thinks 3D is, and that would get more people to see it without knowing what it is because it's 3D. This would make the movie more money, and we just might get a sequel! Unfortunately, 2D animation wouldn't work with 3D.

Whadda you guys think? Bone in 3D? No? Yes? Maybe?
__________________
WORDS OF WISDOM:

If life gives you lemons, create an atomic bomb powered entirely by lemons and set off a nuclear explosion large enough to wipe out all life.

Click here for another piece of advice. BEWARE!

YOU KNOW YOU LIKE POCKET GOD!!!!
iRock is offline   Reply With Quote