View Single Post
Old 01/09/2012, 11:28 am   #148
NSM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yoman45135 View Post
How am I supposed to prove that more of the people who voted cartoony are telltale games fans more than bttf fans?!!
If you can't prove it and have no idea how to prove it, then why are you arguing it so vehemntly? It just seems really strange.

Quote:
Originally Posted by yoman45135 View Post
More telltale fans are going to be on the forums than bttf fans.
want to argue against that as well?
I'm going to point out three logical errors that you keep making:

1) Failing to accept that BTTF fans and TTG fans are not mutually exclusive groups. Back to the Future was the top grossing movie of 1985 and, adjusted for inflation, is the 59th highest grossing movie of all time and considered a classic of its genre. It has a huge fanbase and cross-polination is inevitable.

2) Announcing the release of a Back to the Future game would attract a large number of BTTF fans to the website and, by extention, the site's forums.

3) A fair number of people voted that they want realistic graphics (36%). Which means that you're either arguing that a bit more than a third of those who voted are TTG fans AND prefer realistic graphics (undermining your own point) or that the forum was flooded with BTTF fans who ONLY voted for realistic graphics which kinda supports my second point..

Quote:
Originally Posted by yoman45135 View Post
Jurassic park graphics with more polish is not hard at all and it is very easy for telltale to make so I dont understand why everyone seems to find it important to argue that the graphics should be as bad as telltale can make them.
What games have you designed? What experience do you have with 3D modeling and animation? On what grounds is it "very easy" to make Jurassic Park's graphics better? Just asking you to back up your statements with, you know, facts.
NSM is offline   Reply With Quote