Originally Posted by exo
arguing that something is not true or official because you don't like it is daft.
Arguing that a persons participation in development of something automatically
makes them an undeniable expert in every single aspect of it or its relationship to/effect on similar things, is ludicrously naive and gullible.
What if Christopher Tolkien released another companion book to The Lord of the Rings, in which he claimed Sauron originally had hair the color and appearance of pink cotton candy? His family owns the rights to the story, so why deny his explanation even if he clearly doesn't know what the hell he's talking about nor has significant evidence to prove it, right?