Actually Katie, my post was first to even mention KQ8 in this thread;
Quote:
06/04/2012, 08:07 pm #8
BagginsKQ
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Quote:
I always thought it'd be cool if there was a QFG style King's Quest game with a mix of RPG/adventure
|
Uh, kinda like KQ8?
KQ8 was more like the earlier QFG games than QFG5 was like the previous games in the QFG series (QFG5 was nearly pure action, with no puzzles, the adventure aspects were intentionally stripped out)...
|
It's others who steamrolled it, and envoked KQ8 Law... But eh not like anyone will admit to it...
BTW, in this case the more specific situation for the Law is;
"When Baggins references or discusses KQ8 within a thread, the probability of his post being steamrolled with comparisons involving it not being a KQ game or not part of the KQ series by another party approaches 1."
Actually Katie, "fallacious opinions" do exist. If wrong opinion didn't exist, 'fallacies' wouldn't exist!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy
http://nizkor.org/features/fallacies/
Infact the common idiom 'opinions are neither right nor wrong' is infact itself filled with paradoxal reasoning and can in itself be fallacious as well depending on the type of opinions! But most common idioms can be fallacious in some way. But in the end its basically a parodox, depending on the type of opinion, an opinion can be either right (one is right and one is wrong), wrong (one is wrong and one is right) or neither (neither are right or neither are wrong), or both (both are right or both are wrong)...
For example, hypothetically, if I had the opinion that you were a man, that would make my opinion 'wrong' and not 'factual'... I would be commiting a fallacy. It would make me rather ignorant or stupid! It might be argued that my opinion was no longer "personal" as well (not all opinions are 'personal'), as I had applied it to you (or another proper noun).