I just spent a good 45 minutes writing a detailed, well though out response to what you had to say.
But of course, something went wrong and i lost it all. But i digress.
I'll be replying in noteform instead now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alstom1995
Yeah I do understand, I understand that certain dipsticks like you watch a game and point out minor things like hey did you see that, the character doesn't have a shadow under that tree, I totally can't play the rest of this game now!  You aren't happy unless it's an absolute perfect quality picture yawn.
|
Grow up. Name calling not needed.
I don't.
Graphical bugs when displayed for long amounts of time on screen, distract from the game.
Devs obviously see these, decide to to nothing about it.
Nothing is perfect.
I expect effort to be put into any game i decide to buy.
Graphics are a huge factor in game reviews too.
TT need to realise they cant get by on story alone.
The real world has caught up with them.
They need to step up their game to survive.
Quote:
|
Who cares if the design is a fucking year old, that's nothing! When graphics get to the point that it looks as real as the scenery you see outside in the real world, then to me it's no longer a game and just art!
|
What's wrong with games looking as good as they can?
Nothing. That's what.
Quote:
|
Back in the days of the PS1 we never cared about the graphics and it was always more about the gameplay. Well that's where modern gaming for me has gone wrong. Suddenly it's important that when we're standing in the sea the water is crystal clear, yawn if I want to do that i'll go and stand in the sea in the real world!
|
Don't lie. Of course people did.
Graphics back then were just as important as they are now, in reviews etc.
Crossing technical boundries in computers and consoles, achieving artistic goals, Immersing the player in more immersive, believable environments. Negative thing according to you.
Quote:
Nah not just GTA4 but I was being sarcastic. I just used GTA4 as an example what with it being graphically brilliant and visually immersive, not to mention downright boring!
|
'Graphically brilliant', 'Visually immersive.'
Using these two phrases to describe a game contradicts your argument.