Are you kidding me with these graphics?

[yoman45135]

Im afraid I have to agree I first found out about telltale when they said they were making a Back to the future game (Im incredibly crazy about the films)
and I was dissapointed with the style of graphics but I thought ok let them it wont be that bad but im afraid I started to doubt them more because of the graphics even though they had a fantastic story.

If telltale put even a little effot into making good graphics people would enjoy there games more, usually I dont complain about cartoony things but since telltale make games for really serious films and tv programs it does annoy me a lot and annoys me even more when I see trailers for games like Uncharted or La noire.

If they put effort into it then they could easily get games in the game of the year awards

So please telltale listen to the fans of the movies and tv programs not the people who came here because you made a game about a talking dog and weird rabbit who speak and travel through time because just knowing that they are fans for that reason means they dont care about serious things.

[Irishmile]

You do know that Uncharted and LA Noire cost multi-millions of dollars to make right? They also have more people working on them and usually for 3 times as long. Then they spend sometimes MORE to advertise to ensure they make their money back. Last I knew TTG is still a small company with a small staff that have short deadlines..

Its OK not to like the way the game looks but its a little unfair to compare it to HUGE game releases..

[Ribs]

Originally Posted by yoman45135

Im afraid I have to agree I first found out about telltale when they said they were making a Back to the future game (Im incredibly crazy about the films)
and I was dissapointed with the style of graphics but I thought ok let them it wont be that bad but im afraid I started to doubt them more because of the graphics even though they had a fantastic story.

If telltale put even a little effot into making good graphics people would enjoy there games more, usually I dont complain about cartoony things but since telltale make games for really serious films and tv programs it does annoy me a lot and annoys me even more when I see trailers for games like Uncharted or La noire.

If they put effort into it then they could easily get games in the game of the year awards

So please telltale listen to the fans of the movies and tv programs not the people who came here because you made a game about a talking dog and weird rabbit who speak and travel through time because just knowing that they are fans for that reason means they dont care about serious things.

Because we can only like one franchise and by liking it that means our opinions on others are invalid.

Also; the story on Back to the Future: The Game was mediocre at best. The 'graphics' (which were very good and well-optimized, may I add) are not a point to argue about. If you don't like the aesthetic, that's fine, but don't start saying the game's graphics are bad because they have very little if anything to do with eachother.

[coolsome]

Originally Posted by yoman45135

So please telltale listen to the fans of the movies and tv programs not the people who came here because you made a game about a talking dog and weird rabbit who speak and travel through time because just knowing that they are fans for that reason means they dont care about serious things.

Go to hell you patronising arse biscuit! If you read the forum histoy for when S&M and TMI where out you would know we care about the game as serious as you care about the movies. Also how the hell is a delorian travling in time anymore serious then a dog and hyperkinetic rabbity thing doing it!?

[yoman45135]

Originally Posted by coolsome

Go to hell you patronising arse biscuit! If you read the forum histoy for when S&M and TMI where out you would know we care about the game as serious as you care about the movies. Also how the hell is a delorian travling in time anymore serious then a dog and hyperkinetic rabbity thing doing it!?

I dont see the point of you getting pissed because it just makes you look like a fanboy, anyway a delorean travelling throught time is serious like bob gale said: 'If you built a time machiene you would want to be able to move it'
Also the delorean looks really cool and the stainless steel was supposed to make it easier to travel throught time.

Also how can you take a talking dog seriously?

hope that answers your questions.

[coolsome]

Originally Posted by yoman45135

I dont see the point of you getting pissed because it just makes you look like a fanboy

People are only fanboys when there fans of something the other person doesn't like

anyway a delorean travelling throught time is serious like bob gale said: 'If you built a time machiene you would want to be able to move it'

Being practical doesn't make something serious.

Also the delorean looks really cool and the stainless steel was supposed to make it easier to travel throught time.

I wasn't insulting how it looked.

Also how can you take a talking dog seriously?

hope that answers your questions.

Really what it hinges on is in fictinal moves like JP BTTF or games like S&M is how much your willing to hold your sense of disbelief and take it seriously. At the end of the day the all just fiction with wild story's that would never happen in rl.

[yoman45135]

Originally Posted by coolsome

I wasn't insulting how it looked.


Really what it hinges on is in fictinal moves like JP BTTF or games like S&M is how much your willing to hold your sense of disbelief and take it seriously. At the end of the day the all just fiction with wild story's that would never happen in rl.

You said how is it serious and the only way you ment it is: The fact it''s a car

The facts it's a sports car.

also things like bttf and jp are serious because they have action and emotion and the people who like them agree it's serious.

But when it's things like S&M there are no action or emotion it's just some weird random things just to make people laugh.

Even though there is comedy in bttf it's not what it's built on it's very serious for example when doc gets shot or the clocktower scene or the end when marty thinks he will never see doc again.

Can you really say S&M has emotion like that or epic action where people almost die because they didnt escape in time.
(I dont know I have not played it but I have seen loads of trailers and it looks silly to me)

[coolsome]

Originally Posted by yoman45135

Can you really say S&M has emotion like that or epic action where people almost die because they didnt escape in time.
(I dont know I have not played it but I have seen loads of trailers and it looks silly to me)

Yes yes it does. I fail to see how it makes something serious though. I mean hot fuzz and double team had that in it and there's no way there serious movies.

[Vainamoinen]

Originally Posted by caeska

Look at Jurassic Park: Good characters, good story. But the graphics look like they were, and they probably were, done by amateurs who never attended a graphic design class in their lives.

...maybe you should attend a graphic design class first? I assure you, JP's graphic design was marvelous. It's the 100-programmer/20-million game engine that just isn't there, and I'm not sure if anyone really expected that.

I've my quarrels with the graphic style as seen in that first L&O trailer, but pros are at work here nonetheless.

[Ribs]

Also; just because something's silly doesn't mean it can't pack an emotional punch. End of Blackadder IV strikes me as a good example of this.

[Scnew]

Originally Posted by yoman45135

Can you really say S&M has emotion like that or epic action where people almost die because they didnt escape in time.

Go over to the Sam and Max forum and read all the delicious tears shed by people over the Sam and Max season 3 ending.

[yoman45135]

Originally Posted by Scnew

Go over to the Sam and Max forum and read all the delicious tears shed by people over the Sam and Max season 3 ending.

well then they are a bit silly crying over a talking dog and talking alien rabbit.

[coolsome]

Originally Posted by yoman45135

well then they are a bit silly crying over a talking dog and talking alien rabbit.

Max isn't an alien.

[yoman45135]

Originally Posted by coolsome

Max isn't an alien.

Ok then but he isnt completley a rabbit so he must be some sort of mutant (and if I got it wrong again I dont care, I dont like sam and max games from what I have seen.)

[coolsome]

Ribs I'm just gonna borrow this K?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0la5DBtOVNI

[yoman45135]

Originally Posted by coolsome

Ribs I'm just gonna borrow this K?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0la5DBtOVNI

Im not being a dick im telling the truth, why do you think games get rated for graphics, well if your right the people who thought they should add it are wrong and dont know anything because they dont like silly graphics, why dont you stop defending telltale all the time and actually try to understand what people are saying instead of thinking they are saying it for fun.

[coolsome]

All your saying is people who like Sam and Max are idiots cos there talking animals.

[yoman45135]

Originally Posted by coolsome

All your saying is people who like Sam and Max are idiots cos there talking animals.

im saying there idiots if they are more serious about talking animals than something like bttf, jp or law and order.

[caeska]

Originally Posted by yoman45135

im saying there idiots if they are more serious about talking animals than something like bttf, jp or law and order.

I'm going to underline something very important here: There is no word "im" in the English vocabulary. There is however a word called "I'm", which is actually two words. It's possible to write it either with the apostrophe or as "I am", and one of those options have to be used. Both have the same meaning and they are both spelled with a capital "I", unlike the way you spelled it. But you can't write "im" ever, because that is quite simply not a word that exists in our reality.

Similarly the word "there" can't be used in the context from your above quote, it would be more correct to use "they are" or "they're". "There" is a different word altogether.

Also it is incorrect to refer to the TV show "Law & Order" as "law and order".
Both the words "Law" and "Order" have to begin with capital letters and the two words need to be separated with an ampersand (&).

[yoman45135]

Originally Posted by caeska

I'm going to underline something very important here: There is no word "im" in the English vocabulary. There is however a word called "I'm", which is actually two words. It's possible to write it either with the apostrophe or as "I am", and one of those options have to be used. Both have the same meaning and they are both spelled with a capital "I", unlike the way you spelled it. But you can't write "im" ever, because that is quite simply not a word that exists in our reality.

Similarly the word "there" can't be used in the context from your above quote, it would be more correct to use "they are" or "they're". "There" is a different word altogether.

Also it is incorrect to refer to the TV show "Law & Order" as "law and order".
Both the words "Law" and "Order" have to begin with capital letters and the two words need to be separated with an ampersand (&).

This is the internet not school you just made a pointless post telling me things I already know.

Oh and the reason I dont put it right is because I spend my time thinking about what im gonna post, not how im going to post it.