Telltale Games

Ninnuendo · 10/06/2012, 10:49 am

Danny was incapacitated and no threat so I left him, hoping Lilly would do it for me. I seriously considered killing Andy because grabbing Clem pissed me off, instead I just beat him to a pulp, told him both his family were dead and left him for zombiefood.

Pellet · 10/06/2012, 10:49 am

the 1st time i played i helped kenny in the meat locker and then spared Danny
but quickly turned off my xbox when lilly said somthing like "you kill my dad but let this pos live"

Wrighty · 10/06/2012, 10:50 am

Killed neither, didnt really want to traumatise Clem any further. Besides, why get my hands dirty when the walkers are obviously going to kill em for me? Danny was trapped in a beartrap and Andy had been beaten to a pulp :P

Im also not going to start executing people on my own authority.

Razzak · 10/06/2012, 11:38 am

I havent kill them because their punishment must be more severe.

IndigoHawk · 10/07/2012, 05:11 am

I killed them both. They were a danger to other survivors, I had the opportunity to stop them, and they were too dangerous to take responsibility for them by making them part of the group. There's no judicial system, so punishments are pretty much limited to execution and exile. Exile can't be used if the survivor is a danger to others, as the St Johns were.

However, I agree with taking a vote on what to do. Lee didn't need to make the decision alone, and Clem didn't need to watch executions. With the zombies, there wasn't much time to vote. It would have been fine to leave the St Johns behind (even though they would probably die), because they weren't part of the group, and the group is responsible for survival over justice. If the St Johns were part of the group, it would have been better to take them along and then vote on their fate. The St Johns might have fled in that case, but that's a privilege of group membership.

I don't agree with purposely leaving the St Johns alive but sabotaging their defenses or otherwise making sure the St Johns don't have a fighting chance against the zombies. Make a decision on whether to execute them, not pretend that indirectly killing them is morally better than killing them. It's not justice or keeping your hands clean to make the St Johns suffer in terror before the zombies get them. It's cruel.

Cooperal · 10/07/2012, 05:37 am

Killed Danny. I didn't expect a bear trap to keep him down if I left him... in a shed full of... well you saw what was in there yourself. I'd prefer a pinned down zombie. I was not aware that Clem was watching however and felt a little regret just as I'd done it. But had I left him, either Lilly would've used him to take out some anger or the zombies would've claimed him.

I let Andy be. I think I'd weakened him beyond the point of being a threat. And it didn't appear that he had any effective weaponry in reach. And I already made the mistake of letting group members see a side of me that I didn't want them to see.

10/06/2012, 10:50 am	#23
Wrighty Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Scotland Posts: 429	Killed neither, didnt really want to traumatise Clem any further. Besides, why get my hands dirty when the walkers are obviously going to kill em for me? Danny was trapped in a beartrap and Andy had been beaten to a pulp :P Im also not going to start executing people on my own authority. __________________ Team Kenny!

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
(Ep.2 SPOILERS!) Did anyone actually kill the St. John. Brothers?	Christoaster	The Walking Dead Story Discussion - SPOILERS	60	11/23/2012 12:09 pm
Executing the St. Johns: The Only Moral Choice	JackSchirmer	The Walking Dead Story Discussion - SPOILERS	29	09/12/2012 04:07 pm
The St. John's Methods SPOILERS WITHIN	Saracenar	The Walking Dead Discussion	3	07/05/2012 12:50 am
Are the chapman brothers friends with Jonathan Ian Mathers?	Leplaya	Strong Bad General Discussion	2	06/30/2010 08:43 am
Do the Brothers Chaps hate anime now?	BiggerJ	Strong Bad General Discussion	18	02/22/2009 11:13 am

10/06/2012, 10:49 am	#21
Ninnuendo Senior Member Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 263	Danny was incapacitated and no threat so I left him, hoping Lilly would do it for me. I seriously considered killing Andy because grabbing Clem pissed me off, instead I just beat him to a pulp, told him both his family were dead and left him for zombiefood.

10/06/2012, 10:49 am	#22
Pellet Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 162	the 1st time i played i helped kenny in the meat locker and then spared Danny but quickly turned off my xbox when lilly said somthing like "you kill my dad but let this pos live"

10/06/2012, 11:38 am	#24
Razzak Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 74	I havent kill them because their punishment must be more severe.

10/07/2012, 05:11 am	#25
IndigoHawk Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 123	I killed them both. They were a danger to other survivors, I had the opportunity to stop them, and they were too dangerous to take responsibility for them by making them part of the group. There's no judicial system, so punishments are pretty much limited to execution and exile. Exile can't be used if the survivor is a danger to others, as the St Johns were. However, I agree with taking a vote on what to do. Lee didn't need to make the decision alone, and Clem didn't need to watch executions. With the zombies, there wasn't much time to vote. It would have been fine to leave the St Johns behind (even though they would probably die), because they weren't part of the group, and the group is responsible for survival over justice. If the St Johns were part of the group, it would have been better to take them along and then vote on their fate. The St Johns might have fled in that case, but that's a privilege of group membership. I don't agree with purposely leaving the St Johns alive but sabotaging their defenses or otherwise making sure the St Johns don't have a fighting chance against the zombies. Make a decision on whether to execute them, not pretend that indirectly killing them is morally better than killing them. It's not justice or keeping your hands clean to make the St Johns suffer in terror before the zombies get them. It's cruel.

10/07/2012, 05:37 am	#26
Cooperal Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 105	Killed Danny. I didn't expect a bear trap to keep him down if I left him... in a shed full of... well you saw what was in there yourself. I'd prefer a pinned down zombie. I was not aware that Clem was watching however and felt a little regret just as I'd done it. But had I left him, either Lilly would've used him to take out some anger or the zombies would've claimed him. I let Andy be. I think I'd weakened him beyond the point of being a threat. And it didn't appear that he had any effective weaponry in reach. And I already made the mistake of letting group members see a side of me that I didn't want them to see.