Why so much hate for the Chapman plot? I thought he was interesting and a decent twist. Wondering why he took his son out on a hunt? Probably something Rick and Carl would do if you think about it, hell Lee was teaching Clem how to shoot etc... except Campman got his son killed.
He stalked the survivors because he lost his son, his wife, his daughter and that was centered around his failure. Failure to secure anything including their food and supplies. He has nothing left to lose so why not take what's precious to those he blames? It's not like there's anything else to do in the apocalyptic zombie wastes.
As far as "none of the hard choices making a difference". It's fatalistic, you are to believe they will work and things will be okay or at least better. Then they get worse, much worse. It's realistic, and tragic. Tragedy doesn't end with a happy ending and everything neatly wrapped up, I think consumers of entertainment are far to used to happy endings.
To me Lee is an Oedipus character, he's doomed from the start and when you first started the game you should have realized things were not going to go well. As people continually died and futility of most if not all of their plans set in, it became increasingly obvious. The early predictions that Lee wouldn't survive became more and more viable. Rather than having him give up or check himself out, he cut of his arm and kept going. Until the end, despite the certainty of failure.
That's a story that tries to say something. Rather than say, Lee picks up some Zombrex and they find the CDC and it's full of said Zombrex and him and Clem live out their days there till he passes away of old age in his sleep and she shoots him so he doesn't come back.
Last edited by Atarius; 11/23/2012 at 01:04 pm.
|