Quote:
Originally Posted by Rommel49
That rationale doesn't really make sense though. Simply because Lee wasn't in a position to actually make Clem do anything at the time. She was either willing to shoot Lee or she wasn't; if the former, it's unnecessary, if the latter, it's irrelevant to try and teach her at that point.
It also doesn't make much practical sense. In any survival scenario, the goal is to mitigate risk and maximize resources. The bullet she uses on Lee is one she doesn't have to deal with an actual threat or to potentially get food. There's also the matter of the herd outside. Live to fight another day and all - every round she expends on non-threats is a chance she won't get that oppurtunity.
|
I'm sorry, I've read this five times - and I still don't see how what your saying applies to this situation. You're trying to apply reason and rationality to an emotional situation. It doesn't stand up.
Fact 1) Attachment will get you killed in a ZA - where anyone you love can and will try to kill you if they "die"
Fact 2) Lee's "job" is to train Clem to survive, knowing how to deal with Fact 1 is essential.
Also - you're overlooking the power of persuasion. Clem didn't want to, obviously, but Lee her mentor and surrogate father made her do it. The same way you make any kid who has an emotional bond do anything they don't want to. Persuasion.
For someone who claims military experience (iirc) you should know the value of morale. What exactly would it have done emotionally, to Clem, had she left Lee (her parent figure at that point) as a walker?
Don't overlook the fact she's still a nine year old little girl - 3 months into a ZA or not.