In high school I was a great student (see also: teacher's pet goody goody suck). I loved school. However, my dedication to scholarship waned a little when I started uni and discovered the joys of vodka, alcopops, and cheap riesling (not necessarily all at once).
I wasn't really happy with good but not stellar grades, so I became more studious again as the "omg adult freedom" craziness wore off and I took an Honours year. I think it also helped that in the later years of university, I had more control over which subjects I did. The first couple of semesters involved some subjects that I didn't particularly want to take but were core for the degree. In later years I could specialise a lot more and choose the subjects that interested me most.
Anyway, not sure what kind of student I am these days. It would probably depend on what I was studying and why. I'd need to be pretty engaged with the subject material (or have some kind of significant external incentive / end goal), because I fear I've become intellectually lazy and may not follow through with what I start.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rather Dashing
Oh, I thought you meant poor as in no money.
|
Ditto. I wonder if the "no money" interpretation would be the most common one. I'm betting yes, just because of the general association between full-time study and lack of money.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzieMonkey
Also, does anyone else here find Geography totally boring?
|
I rather enjoyed geography, and think it's a decent high school subject - it's fairly important to at least be aware of the wide world outside our own backyards.