Quote:
Originally Posted by Talahar
It's not hard to find out names of people who work in games companies.
It's not hard to get a user account under someone else's name.
That's why I'm not convinced.
A couple of fake good *USER* reviews on metacritic? Not really that beneficial.
Constructing a scandal involving a company? Far bigger result.
Follow the money.
|
If impersonation were an issue, Telltale would probably have said something to that effect instead of defending the reviewers.
As for benefit, good reviews written by the author (or friends and colleagues of the author) aren't uncommon. Even within the game industry, we've seen similar controversies following the releases of Dragon Age II and the Elemental: War of Magic novelization.
My feeling is that when the success or failure of a product directly affects your livelihood (especially if there's some uncertainty or difficulty within your company), you're probably going to act more on impulse and self-preservation than anything. I doubt any malice was intended.
Quote:
JP:TG is literally just a badly animated movie that has absolutely no meaningful interaction. It's like if you were watching the movie on DVD, and every time it changed scenes it made you press a button at random on your DVD remote, otherwise it would replay the last scene. It's not even close to being a game.
Sam & Max contained actual puzzles, and required thought and logic. You could move around. You had an inventory filled with items to use to solve puzzles. There were in depth dialogue trees.
|
Yeah, different target audiences. Telltale tailored Sam & Max and Monkey Island (continuations of existing game franchises, after all) toward dedicated adventure gamers.
However, with a movie property as big as Jurassic Park, the intent must have been to attract a broader, less game-savvy fanbase. Whether they were successful remains up in the air.
Quote:
|
Having an investigation based on well-worded reviews is laughable and quite ignorant. It pains me to see that we now reside in a world where good grammar and spelling is treated with suspicion. So disappointing.
|
TBH, I think correct grammar is a red herring. The real cause for suspicion is that the reviews read like PR blurbs (lots of adjectives and modifiers, bold praise for Telltale itself and not just the game, overemphasis on how true the game is to the movies) as opposed to actual critique. The tone isn't too different from the text you might find at the back of a game box or in a catalog.
Quote:
|
Even worse that they didn't even bother sending out review copies.
|
Yeah, it seems that there wasn't much confidence in this release. No demo or early review copies. Little fanfare. Metacritic reviews written by staff.
You could argue that Telltale possibly expected an unfair reaction from hardcore gamers and reviewers. However, given the previous delay announcement and the fact that all four episodes were released at once and are unavailable individually (with an episodic release structure, on-going sales potential sharply declines if players don't like the first installment), I can't help but suspect that development was problematic.
Quote:
|
That's unfortunate, hopefully the TTG reviews can be removed
|
For what it's worth, one of the reviewers has changed the content and score of his critique, while admitting that he works for Telltale. It isn't a perfect fix, but what's done is done.
At any rate, I'm not convinced that Metacritic backlash will have a large impact on sales.