Quote:
Originally Posted by Chyron8472
What did they change about III that sucked?
Again, I'm genuinely asking, as a person who has not played any Age of Empires game.
|
Basically, it was way too easy. The hometown system made it ridiculous, really because it was a way of instantly getting tons of stuff that was out of your normal league. When I played it, there was very little strategy required to easily win every scenario, whereas in the original and AoE II, it was essential to plan your encounters and make good use of resources. Here, it didn't seem to matter as much because you could always send away for it.
I also wasn't too fond of the fact that there wasn't as much of an emphasis on actual history, which has always kinda been the foundation for the series. Part of the joy of the original was playing through actual historical events and watching your actions become part of history. The third one didn't really have that because most of the characters you were using were completely fictional.
And, as a pretentious reason... Age of Empires II was beautiful and aged well. I still love the cutscenes. And, as adventure game fans will note... hand drawn artwork. Also, the music was pretty fantastic, especially for a strategy game. It never overshadowed the action but had a real presence nonetheless.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laserschwert
How can you play it if the computer isn't compatible?
|
Exactly my point.
Also, I didn't mind Age of Mythology as much because it at least had a difficulty curve... but I still vastly prefer Age of Kings/Conquerer's Expansion.